Hello reader(s), this week, as part of my project, I:
-
Looked at the foreign relations of coconut-producing countries to see how cement replacement usage may affect (or be affected) by those relations in the future.
-
Researched and calculated emissions for various SCMs in terms of inherent (contained within the material/reactions) and energy-usage CO2 emissions.
-
Finished up the burning 16 kg of the CSA with Nick. Just enough for running strength and other standard tests at Cemex (hopefully).
-
Planned my small-scale concrete tests based on literature methodologies.
-
Packed my belongings for my Japan spring break trip!
(Map of Fly Ash production from coal-burning for electricity)
(Map of Coconut production)
Geopolitics Investigations:
First, I created visual maps of the production of all the SCMs (Supplementary Cementitious Materials) to better represent the information in terms of geography. It seems that currently, Asia, especially China, has lots of SCMs due to it being a global production hub for Cement, Fly Ash, Steel/Iron, Silicon, etc. In other words, SCM-usage heavily relies on China. Fortunately, China has relations with many developing regions such as other countries in Asia and Africa (Belt and Road Initiative), so China could capture, use and sell more SCMs to also reduce their massive emissions and improve their standing with the “global north”.
Similarly, I found that Indonesia has long held good economic ties with both China but also major western-leaning nations such as the US and Japan (as seen in the chart below). Indonesia also has a fairly large cement industry and high coal usage, so pressure is on for them to massively reduce emissions to meet UN climate goals. Therefore, by increasing SCM usage and importation (trading with China), economic ties can be strengthened and western nations will also be happy with the reduction in emissions from increased SCM usage. On top of that, the coconut farmers (some of the poorest in the world) could have their standard of living raised by this extra income from CSA being used (and perhaps even subsidized by environmental organizations).
The burning of the CSA:
Small-scale testing I’ve been hinting at:
To summarize:
-
Increased SCM usage, especially with less carbon-intensive ones, could be a win-win for international trade, relations and climate goals.
-
The burning/testing of CSA seems to be on the right track
-
We get to perform some interesting small-scale tests soon
Thanks for reading,
Until next time, I have been Max Polosky.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.