1. Communicated & discussed with Nick from Fortera and Eric from Cemex on initial results and plans for the industrial tests of Coconut Shell Ash (CSA) in concrete.

2. Researched all about rice farming and its emissions/sustainability to get a better idea of the true “Price of Rice” compared to other waste SCMs.

3. Got various supplies ready for small0scale lab tests of CSA at school.

    

Rice Husk Ash as a Supplementary Cementitious Material (SCM)

First of all, what is Rice Husk Ash (RHA)? RHA is derived from rice husks/rice hulls (meaning the same thing, and pictured below). They are generally a waste product of rice production after the edible rice is removed from them. The good thing is that RHA is also composed of around 20% ash. About 90% of that ash is Silica (SiO2), one of the main pozzolanic compounds, along with Alumina (Al2O3).

Rice Husk Ash in Concrete

This ability for RHA to act as a “pozzolan” means that it can help form stronger compounds within concrete working with the cementitious calcium oxide (CaO) in cement. Optimally, around 20% of cement can be replaced with RHA. Another factor supporting the growing use of RHA as a partial cement replacement in concrete is cost (around half of cement’s cost in my estimates). Since RHA has much more supply than demand, using it can reduce the cost of the concrete produced. Lower costs would be great for developing regions with access to the rice and a growing need for cheap and efficient infrastructure development.

Benefits and Drawbacks of Rice Husk Ash

Now, if you didn’t see last week’s post, you may be asking: but doesn’t burning 80% of the rice husk to make RHA create carbon emissions? The answer is yes, but burning RHA as biomass fuel does also create around 26,000 kJ of steam-electricity per kg of RHA produced, which make it more carbon-efficient than fossil fuels. Of course, we would like zero emissions, but less is still better. Unfortunately, besides the carbon emissions of RHA, there are also other greenhouse gases (GHGs) created such as methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). CH4 has a 100-year global warming potential of around 28x CO2, while N2O’s is 273x CO2. These are mostly the result of fertilizer use and certain methane-generating bacteria in rice-farming, but can be minimized through changes in practices. These changes may be more expensive and difficult to implement though, especially with rice being such an important staple crop in developing regions.

Progress Updates (Industrial Tests, Lab Tests)

The industrial concrete tests at Cemex with various replacement percentages of Coconut Shell Ash (CSA) will continue to 28 days, although results still don’t look promising. Investigations will be carried out to figure out the root cause(s).