Fifth Blog - Preliminary Data and Analysis (Kahaan Vyas)
March 9, 2025
Definitions:
ASL – average shot length
Diagetic – sound from within the movie’s world
The Searchers (credits end at 1:30)
- ASL: 9.8
- Begins with a bombastic orchestral score and a title sequence. The credits continue with a traditional American cowboy song in the background.
- The film opens with a woman opening a door, revealing the beautiful expanse of Monument Valley, accompanied by an orchestrated American folk music-inspired score.
- Dialogue is first spoken at 2:11, but there is no initial silence such as with Leone’s and Eastwood’s films.
- Editing: Classical Hollywood editing, much longer average shot length, as well as extensive use of static framing
- Actors move within the static framing, with subtle camera movements used sparingly for emphasis
Once Upon a Time in the West (OUATITW; movie starts at 0:30)
-
- ASL: 7.0
- Initial silence broken: 1:45
- 2 lines of dialogue before more silence
- No more dialogue until: 12:32
- This sequence is entirely devoid of music, with the only sound being creaking wood, flies buzzing, water dripping, and a windmill.
- Initial silence broken: 1:45
- ASL: 7.0
- Editing: Leone frequently juxtaposes extreme close-ups with expansive scenery, in his words, making the face into a sort of landscape. Shots vary in length, from extremely quick energetic cuts to almost unorthodox in their extended length (depending on the scene). A frequent rhythm is Leone stretching tension out to the farthest possible point, and then some beyond that, before a quick and instant release.
-
- Extended multi-minute silences are more or less solely featured in OUATITW, a unique feature of Sergio Leone’s style (the opening is around 12 minutes of silence).
Unforgiven (the movie starts at 1:11, with an opening crawl and quiet music set to the backdrop of Munny’s silhouetted homestead in the sunset)
- ASL: 4.2
- Initial silence broken: 1:41
- Quiet music soon fades out and is replaced with diegetic sounds of wood creaking, rain, etc.
- Initial silence broken: 1:41
- Editing: Unforgiven presents a more modern, American editing style, with much shorter shots on average
- In dialogue exchanges: shot -> reaction shot
- Similar to Leone, different from Ford
- Frequent silent reaction shots, a trademark of Leone’s, show his influence on Eastwood’s style
- In dialogue exchanges: shot -> reaction shot
- Dramatic Character introductions
- The ‘Schofield Kid’ appears out of nowhere, surprising us as much as Munny
- A very similar entrance to Harmonica in OUATITW, at least in audience perception (surprise at a character appearing out of the blue)
- The ‘Schofield Kid’ appears out of nowhere, surprising us as much as Munny
- The West appears gritty and grimy, VERY much akin to the sweaty faces of Leone’s films, a feature absent from the romanticized Monument Valley of John Ford
- Eastwood also partially dedicated the film to Leone, citing the Italian’s influence on his filmmaking style.
Three Scenes: ‘Searchers mezcal’, ‘OUATITW coffee’, and ‘Unforgiven coffee’
— I am working on a way to acquire screengrabs of the movies to visually show what I’m discussing (as I think that would greatly bolster my data analysis), but for now, the rough draft of the words will have to suffice.
The Searchers (1:17:56 -> 1:21:00)
- Ethan and Martin enter the cantina with a distant static shot showing the full room. Mose enters the frame, jumping from the right. The camera imperceptibly follows this action and moves a centimeter to the left, but it is still the same shot, framing, and distance. Ford cuts to the bar, framing the bartender and the three patrons in tandem. As Mose is talking, Ford pushes the camera in to frame the three characters and cut the bartender out of the frame, who had already begun to move out of the camera’s view. This shot remains still for the rest of the dialogue exchange until Mose mentions another man, who happens to be sitting behind them. Ethan shifts, revealing the Mexican man is sitting behind him, before Ford cuts to the same angle that Ethan and Martin entered the Cantina with. As the new character approaches the bar, Ford cuts to the previous bar angle, this time without the extra push in, so we see the bartender as well. Ford repeats the same push in as Martin leaves the frame, dejected that Ethan won’t offer him a drink. The only other angle Ford uses in the entire scene shows Marty eating alone at a table while the three patrons smoke cigars and talk business at the bar in the background. Having finished, Ethan approaches Martin and tells him they’re leaving, and the scene ends by cutting to the same angle that started the scene. With three camera angles and six cuts, Ford constructs an extremely efficient and unfrivolous three-minute scene. Leone’s stylized and choreographed camera movements stand in stark contrast to Ford’s restraint.
OUATITW
- The scene starts with a Medium shot of Jill and follows her as she walks around the home. She turns her back to the camera, walks over to Cheyenne, and sits at the coffee table where he faces the camera. We cut to a close of Cheyenne, seeing his reaction to Jill’s growing comfort in his presence. We go back and forth between the two with over-the-shoulder shots as they converse; both characters stay in the shot regardless of the angle. Leone switches this shot/reverse rhythm to a series of intimate close-ups, signifying the characters’ growing relationship, before releasing the tension by cutting to the previous over the shoulder where Jill gets up to put the coffee pot in the sink and clean the dinner table.
Unforgiven
- In Unforgiven, the scene starts with a medium shot of Munny and follows him as he walks to the table where the initially apprehensive ‘Schofield Kid’ is sitting, back turned to the camera. Munny offers the Kid a mug of coffee, and as his hand stretches to receive it, Eastwood cuts to a reverse shot of the Kid and Munny’s back, signifying his growing comfort in Munny’s presence. We go back and forth between the two to gauge their reactions, with the odd close-up on Munny depending on the dialogue; both characters stay in the shot regardless of the angle (except for the close-ups, which are very similar to Leone’s). Eventually, Eastwood favors exchanging mediums of the two characters, and the camera follows Munny as he walks through the scene, the same as Jill in OUATITW. The tension is released when Munny’s son enters the scene, and just as in OUATITW, Eastwood cuts to the previously used over-the-shoulder, framing Munny and his son in the doorway of their home as the Kid watches with his back turned to the camera (in the same way as Jill and Cheyenne when she gets up to put the coffee pot in the sink).
The data I have gathered so far signifies a throughline in Leone’s innovations and that he stylized the Western on top of what John Ford had done. Eastwood is influenced by Leone’s thematic and cinematic style; however, my data is currently incomplete. I have more scenes in mind to analyze, as well as another rewatch of the films after my preliminary data gathering is fully complete, to see if there’s anything I missed. One large point I did not touch on in the above notes is something I intend to bolster with literature: Leone more or less created the anti-hero archetype for future Westerns: Clint Eastwood’s “Man With No Name” and Charles Bronson’s “Harmonica” are prime examples, and this type of hero is the predominant protagonist model for Westerns after Leone’s introduction.
Reader Interactions
Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

This looks like very detailed analysis so far; this might just be because I haven’t seen any of these films and I haven’t taken any film theory classes, but this might be a little… too detailed for me. Just as an example, you mention how long it takes before the first line of dialogue is said in each movie, but as a totally knowledgeable reader, I don’t really understand the significance of it or other detailed scenes you mention. Are you looking at the similarities between Leone films and post-Leone films? How can we know this is as a direct result of Leone’s films? Maybe something to expand on a bit more in future installments of your blog. 🙂
Oral defense question: What criteria did you use to discriminate among the perspectives in order to in order to reach a conclusion?
I’m going to twist the question a little and talk about how I chose to use certain literature or analyze certain films. My primary criteria was prestige, and overall credibility. I utilized the American Film Institute’s “Top 10 Westerns” list to get my non-Leone movies, and chose what is largely thought of as the director’s best work to analyze. I also read work from renowned film scholars, and Leone scholars specifically to ensure my research was sound.
I largely agree here with Dia’s comment, its a lot of very detailed analysis (a lot of which will and has flown over reader’s heads), but isn’t really being correlated to anything (yet).
Also, I’m failing to see how just looking at “top 10 westerns” correlated to “Western OVER THE YEARS,” If anything, use the same institute, but see its rankings for “every” western film, if its available. If not, perhaps any other institution could fit the purposes as well.